← Back to Essays

The Decision a Founder Can't Make: Pivot, Sell, Step Back, or Stay

By Peter Plötner · · 7 min read

A Boeing 737 on its takeoff roll, wheels still on the runway, accelerating toward V1
A Boeing 737 on its takeoff roll, still on the runway. The decision speed, V1, comes during this roll: below it the pilot can still abort and stop, past it there is no longer enough runway, and the only choice left is to fly. Photo: 4300streetcar via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0.

For founders stuck on the big one, pivot, sell, step back, or stay: pilots compute a decision speed before every takeoff. Yours is the line past which not choosing becomes the choice.

By Peter Plötner. Aerospace engineer and Wayfinder Life Coach. More about Peter →

The decision you keep not making is still a decision. You are just letting something else make it for you.

I work with technical founders who are stuck on the big one. Pivot, sell, step back, or stay. It sits in the background for months, and the longer it sits, the heavier it gets. So let me tell you about a number that pilots compute before every single takeoff.

The number pilots compute before every takeoff

It is called V1, the decision speed. As the airplane accelerates down the runway, V1 is the line. Below it, if something goes wrong, you can abort and still stop on the runway you have left. At or above it, you are committed. You fly, even with a serious failure, because there is no longer enough runway to stop.

Here is the part that matters for you. The decision has to be made before you reach V1. If you are still deciding when the speed arrives, you have already lost the runway. Hesitation does not keep your options open. It hands the choice to physics.

And the line is not in a fixed place. It is not even really about the aircraft. It is about how much room you have. A light plane on a long runway has margin to spare. It could abort at its takeoff speed and still stop with runway left over, so it never has to commit at all. A jumbo needs almost that whole runway, so it runs close to the edge, and its line is real and unforgiving. Same idea, different margins. The line is the gap between what you are flying and the room you have, recomputed for every takeoff.

Your decision has a V1 too. Wait too long and the choice gets made for you. The cash runs out. The co-founder leaves. The market moves. The board acts, and you are no longer choosing between pivot, sell, step back, and stay. You are taking whichever one is left. How far out it sits is not about how big your company is, and neither size is better or worse. It is about your margin, the cash, the time, the real options you still hold. With room to spare you can change course almost to the last moment. Close to the edge, the choice is already on top of you.

So the skill is not deciding fast. It is two quieter things. Knowing whether your waiting is real. And computing your own V1 instead of borrowing someone else's.

Is your waiting real, or is it avoidance?

Start with the waiting, because not all of it is avoidance. Sometimes you really are waiting for information, and that is fine. Here is how to tell the difference. Ask three questions. One, is there specific information I am waiting for? Two, would it change my decision? Three, can I realistically get it? If all three are yes, hold. You are gathering data. If any one is no, you are not waiting for information. You are buying distance from how uncomfortable the decision feels.

Compute your own V1, not someone else's

Now the harder part, computing your own V1. Be very careful with the easy rules. “I will never give up.” “Always ship.” “Never sell.” They feel like principles. Usually they are the same V1 for every runway. There is almost always a case where giving up, and then meeting your real requirement from a different angle, is the better move. When your answer to a hard decision is a slogan, smooth and certain and one size fits all, that is a sign you have not checked your requirements deeply enough. Real criteria are nuanced, because they are computed from your own conditions, not copied off a poster.

And watch one bias closely. Every option except the one you are in looks better than it is, because you have lived with your current path's failures for years and have not met the new one's yet. Before you decide, look hard at the bad side of every option, not just the bright side of the new one.

Why you can't think this one out loud

There is one more thing that makes this decision uniquely hard for founders, and almost nobody names it. You cannot safely think out loud about it. The people you would normally talk to, your co-founder, your board, your spouse, are all directly affected by the answer. So the moment you open your mouth, you get opinions and judgments instead of being heard. You are trying to structure your own thoughts, and instead you are managing everyone else's reaction. That is why this one tends to get decided in silence, or not at all. It is not that you lack people. It is that you lack a place to think where no one has a stake in the outcome.

I sat past my own V1 once

Early on, I had a co-founder doing the programming who delivered about two weeks of real work over four months. The red flags were everywhere. The biggest one came right at the start. Before he would join, he wanted a written agreement protecting his work, because he was worried we would steal it and cut him out. I should have read that for what it was. Instead I spent months in meetings that were not about the product at all. They were about reassuring him that he was enough.

Letting him go was one of the hardest things I have done, and not because the call was unclear. It was clear. It was hard because setting that boundary, and doing it without pushing the person out of my heart, did not come easily to me. Looking back, the better decision was not the one made faster. It was the one I could have made at the very start, by not bringing him on at all. Now I stay leaner, and I am far more careful about who I add.

Try this week

You do not have to make the call this week. Try this instead.

Picture a normal but ideal Tuesday, five or ten years from now. Not a holiday. Not a vacation. An ordinary day you would love to live, from when you wake up to when you fall asleep. How does it start. What is the work in it, if any. Who is around you. What do you do when the work is done.

That ordinary Tuesday tells you more about your real requirement than any pro and con list, because it shows you what you want your days to feel like, not just the job in them. Then bring it back to the decision in front of you, and notice which option carries you toward that Tuesday and which one carries you away. Pay attention to your body while you do it. It often knows before your spreadsheet does.

What are you really waiting for?

Frequently asked questions

What is V1 in aviation?

V1 is the takeoff decision speed. Below it, a pilot can abort and still stop on the runway that is left. At or above it, there is no longer enough runway to stop, so the pilot is committed to fly, even with a serious failure. The decision has to be made before V1 arrives; hesitating past it hands the choice to physics.

How do I know if I am genuinely waiting for information or just avoiding the decision?

Ask three questions. Is there specific information I am waiting for? Would it change my decision? Can I realistically get it? If all three are yes, you are gathering data, so hold. If any one is no, you are not waiting for information. You are buying distance from how uncomfortable the decision feels.

Isn't “never give up” good advice?

It is the same V1 for every runway, and that is the problem. There is almost always a case where giving up, then meeting your real requirement from a different angle, is the better move. When your answer to a hard decision is a smooth, certain, one-size-fits-all slogan, that is usually a sign you have not checked your own requirements deeply enough.

Why is this decision so much harder for founders?

Because you cannot safely think out loud about it. The people you would normally talk to, your co-founder, your board, your spouse, are all directly affected by the answer, so you get opinions and judgments instead of being heard. You end up managing everyone else's reaction instead of structuring your own thoughts, which is why this one tends to get decided in silence, or not at all.

Who can I actually talk to if everyone close to me has a stake?

You need a place to think where no one is affected by the outcome. That is most of what a coach is for here: not to tell you the move, but to hold a space where you can say the unfinished thought out loud and be heard rather than judged. A neutral, confidential thinking partner is the missing piece, not more opinions from people with a stake.


The deferred decision that quietly becomes its own answer is the subject of The Safest Rocket Never Launches. The misfit that creates the decision in the first place is The Founder Who Outgrew Their Own Company. And the slow drift that decides things for you while nothing seems wrong is Nothing Went Wrong for Ten Years. If you want a place to start, the Essential Self Diagnostic is fifteen questions that take about sixty seconds.

Related essays

The Safest Rocket Never Launches

The Founder Who Outgrew Their Own Company

Nothing Went Wrong for Ten Years

Continue exploring

Take the DiagnosticGet in Touch